Changing Places Researchers awarded with “10-Year Impact Award” from Ubicomp!

Ling Bao, Emmanuel Munguia Tapia, Kent Larson, and Stephen S. Intille  from our group have been recognized with the “10-Year Impact Award” from Ubicomp 2014 for their two papers:  "Activity Recognition from User-Annotated Acceleration Data" and "Activity Recognition in the Home Using Simple and Ubiquitous Sensors" presented in Vienna in 2004! They received the award at the opening ceremony of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing in Seattle.  

Congratulations!

=== Update 9/26/2014 ===

More on the price can be found here: http://ubicomp.org/ubicomp2014/awards.php

The House of the Future at IFA, Berlin

Last week, I had the opportunity to join Samsung`s CEO BK Yoon for a keynote session at the IFA in Berlin, one of the world’s largest and oldest consumer electronics shows (Albert Einstein spoke about the possibilities for radio at IFA in the 30's).  Yoon presented Samsung’s vision of the home of the future and pointed out: “The biggest change, the biggest transformation, will happen in our Homes, at a speed we can barely imagine”.

Six Nontechnical Questions on Self-Driving Cars

Six Nontechnical Questions on Self-Driving Cars

In his recent article “Self-Driving Cars Will Mean More Traffic”, Joshua Brustein refers to a major downside of autonomous cars. He points out that people tend to travel more whenever traveling gets easier. “Hanging out on a moving couch” would make commuting more convenient and increase the attractiveness of living in suburbs. The result: More traffic! In contrast, he asserts that it will be easier to share cars and thus to reduce the number of privately owned vehicles – this argument is often used by technology enabled transportation companies.

These contradictory scenarios and the controversial discussion about how the future of self-driving cars will look like illustrates that the discussion on autonomous cars has reached a new level. We’ve reached a point where autonomous driving is much more than just a matter of technical feasibility. 

Helsinki's ambitious plan to make car ownership pointless in 10 years

The Guardian reports on Helsinki's new mobility action plan. It's good to see research on Mobility-on-Demand Systems finally getting traction in early pilots and cities taking serious strategic measures. Here's a bit of the text below. 

 

The Finnish capital has announced plans to transform its existing public transport network into a comprehensive, point-to-point "mobility on demand" system by 2025 – one that, in theory, would be so good nobody would have any reason to own a car.

Sorry, You Can’t Sell Me on Pay-For-Public-Parking Apps

This article from the Boston Globe:

Make no mistake. At least one app is launching in Boston that will allow users to sell public parking spaces to other users.

The folks behind apps like Haystack say that’s not true. They don’t exist to let users sell parking spaces. Users are just buying and selling information on upcoming parking vacancies. A question arises: How, exactly, do you pronounce tomato?

Haystack, which is slated to launch in Boston soon, allows users to log in and put their parking spot out to bid. Other users who are looking for a spot can agree to come fill it for a fee, paid to the driver, of which Haystack takes a bite. (An app similar to Haystack, called Organic Parking out of Cambridge, is also expected to launch locally at some point this summer.)

A new app would allow users to sell access to public parking spaces.Credit: Jim Davis/Boston Globe

Banning the Private Ownership of Autonomous Vehicles

The Biggest Public Policy Opportunity of Our Lifetimes

This article written by Steve Tiell in the Meeting of the Minds Blog found here.

Over the next decade, driverless vehicles will disrupt transportation systems, causing ripple effects across numerous billion-dollar industries. Through the innovative use of public policy, advanced societies can use this mobility transformation as a keystone event to radically improve public safety and security, greatly increase cohesion among communities, and foster economic prosperity. To be clear, autonomous vehicles will become legal and ubiquitous; the public policy opportunity is about ownership.

Las Vegas Gambles on a Future With Car Sharing for Everyone

This article just out in Smithsonian Magazine. I'm quoted several times in this piece:

Zappos CEO Tony Hsieh is investing $350 million in an ambitious redevelopment plan that includes a new model for getting around Sin City

By: Amy Westervelt

Give people free shipping and a yearlong window for returns, as the retailer Zappos did, and suddenly buying shoes online is a lot more appealing. Give them access to manifold transportation options in a place where good jobs, homes and entertainment are within walking distance, and going car-free just might take on new allure.

That’s the experiment under way in Las Vegas, Nevada, where Zappos CEO Tony Hsieh is investing $350 million over five years in an attempt to re-energize the city’s 1.5-square-mile downtown area. This for-profit investment plan, called Downtown Project, is focused on attracting technologists and artists to a part of town that has long had more empty lots, seedy bars and vacant buildings than hopeful startups or hip boutiques. The hope is that these creative types will “serendipitously” collide with one another in cafes, parks and co-working spaces, exchange ideas, and build great companies as well as a tight-knit community.

New Twist on Vehicle Lighting and other accessories

This CNN article showcases several inventions for bicycle lighting, but it can be applied to other types of vehicles: http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/13/tech/the-laser-light-that-could-cyclist/

The laser projected head light concept is interesting.  Vehicle lighting has not changed much in the past 100 years.  It is interesting to consider how new lighting concepts could be applied to other types of vehicles.

Lighting also applies to surfaces of cars and helmets: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=RYfERdSAtNw

Health Impact of Transportation and Air Quality

MIT's Lab for Aviation and Environment has compiled data and published a paper showing that air pollution in the US (not to mention other countries where it is worse) causes 200,000 premature deaths per year.

http://lae.mit.edu/?p=2821

Not surprisingly, the largest source of air pollution was fossil-fuel vehicles.

However, a surprising finding is that the second largest cause of premature deaths due to air pollution, is actually electric power plants, which are still largely coal-fired.  In terms of particle emission causes of death, electric power plants are tied with vehicles, and are the number one source of sulfur dioxide, which is toxic.  Other countries such as China and Russia are far worse.

 

So while electric vehicles are a great step forward in reducing air pollution and health impact, it is imperative that we move to cleaner sources of electricity generation as well.  This is beyond the scope of transportation.  Certainly, people in cities benefit from electric vehicles, but the people in the rural areas who live downwind of the power plants are being negatively impacted.  The world's appetite for electricity (e.g. computers, servers) is only increasing.

BTW, although not mentioned in this study, MIT's Lab for Aviation and Environment has published many reports on air transportation effects on pollution, and have shown that air transportation -- particularly in Asia -- are a significant source of pollution.  Interestingly, they have also shown that using alternative biofuels doesn't necessarily reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Air transportation pollution in Asia and effect on health:

http://lae.mit.edu/uploads/LAE_report_series/2012/LAE-2012-006-T.pdf

-RF